libpcreposix0-8.41-6.4.2 >  A `?Sp9|v_f;c >"d"fc<7p)OFP2@]]P\9H0I6STh/׈I9y]X؋rٕlfؚOQt6c=?Ne^q@ÃkuY%[Py,_NNN{9Oa/ ӏ$+a\HnT |T/d@8䎴g=vtZc6c67e5c3c3123730938cb4d218bf86b8a3367584bb9b0d6678ce77b051a84d962c1724c95b7e2532c71ff3987623c7ac1d97b38/`?Sp9|dP=")\Kb!}j|F kz_v36)t8r_r}-&&5ۖX׵;jA;' a1҉y GT|/S$5H`9qxe(D>GQ!^{r ]7͆ U8_bm  q;%b˅(!l9ձʤTB>V/XsVK"u޳x5zDgcZBA_'@ڼ~{D0 >p@?d  M(,Efs      4<FPhp   (8 9P :< >@FGHIXY\,]4^\bhcdefluvwDxLyTzl|Clibpcreposix08.416.4.2A library for Perl-compatible regular expressionsThe PCRE library is a set of functions that implement regular expression pattern matching using the same syntax and semantics as Perl 5. pcreposix provides a POSIX-compatible API to the PCRE engine.`?ibs-arm-3HSUSE Linux Enterprise 15SUSE LLC BSD-3-Clausehttps://www.suse.com/System/Librarieshttp://www.pcre.org/linuxaarch64H`? `? 609736eaab19e4a446868d69e3333b4ae726e2790b094be1002ab61df55fe4d6libpcreposix.so.0.0.5rootrootrootrootpcre-8.41-6.4.2.src.rpmlibpcreposix.so.0()(64bit)libpcreposix0libpcreposix0(aarch-64)@@@@@    /sbin/ldconfig/sbin/ldconfigld-linux-aarch64.so.1()(64bit)ld-linux-aarch64.so.1(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit)libc.so.6()(64bit)libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit)libpcre.so.1()(64bit)rpmlib(CompressedFileNames)rpmlib(FileDigests)rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix)rpmlib(PayloadIsXz)3.0.4-14.6.0-14.0-15.2-14.14.1`qZY@Y@Yw2Y1S@XYXW9WaC@VV@UB@T@bwiedemann@suse.comfvogt@suse.comkstreitova@suse.commatz@suse.comastieger@suse.commpluskal@suse.comastieger@suse.comdimstar@opensuse.orgastieger@suse.commpluskal@suse.comastieger@suse.comastieger@suse.comp.drouand@gmail.com- Do not run profiling 'check' in parallel to make package build reproducible (boo#1040589)- Use %license (boo#1082318)- add pcre-8.41-stack_frame_size_detection.patch to fix pcre stack frame size detection because modern compilers broke it by cloning and inlining pcre match() function [bsc#1058722]- RunTest needs much stack, on s390x more than the default 8 MB. [bnc#1046102]- pcre 8.41: * If pcregrep in multiline mode with --only-matching matched several lines, it restarted scanning at the next line instead of moving on to the end of the matched string, which can be several lines after the start. * Fix a missing else in the JIT compiler reported by 'idaifish'. CVE-2017-6004 bsc#1025709 * A (?# style comment is now ignored between a basic quantifier and a following '+' or '?' (example: /X+(?#comment)?Y/. * Avoid use of a potentially overflowing buffer in pcregrep * Fix issues reported by fuzzers in pcretest: - Check for values < 256 when calling isprint() in pcretest. - Give an error for too big a number after \O. * In the 32-bit library in non-UTF mode, an attempt to find a Unicode property for a character with a code point greater than 0x10ffff (the Unicode maximum) caused a crash. CVE-2017-7186 bsc#1030066, CVE-2017-7244 bsc#1030807 * The alternative matching function, pcre_dfa_exec() misbehaved if it encountered a character class with a possessive repeat, for example [a-f]{3}+. * When pcretest called pcre_copy_substring() in 32-bit mode, it set the buffer length incorrectly, which could result in buffer overflow. CVE-2017-7245 bsc#1030805, CVE-2017-7246 bsc#1030803- Enable jit on aarch64 - Enable profiled building- pcre 8.40: * Using -o with -M in pcregrep could cause unnecessary repeated output when the match extended over a line boundary. * Fix register overwite in JIT when SSE2 acceleration is enabled. * Ignore "show all captures" (/=) for DFA matching. * Fix JIT unaligned accesses on x86 * In any wide-character mode (8-bit UTF or any 16-bit or 32-bit mode), without PCRE_UCP set, a negative character type such as \D in a positive class should cause all characters greater than 255 to match, whatever else is in the class. There was a bug that caused this not to happen if a Unicode property item was added to such a class, for example [\D\P{Nd}] or [\W\pL]. * When pcretest was outputing information from a callout, the caret indicator for the current position in the subject line was incorrect if it was after an escape sequence for a character whose code point was greater than \x{ff}. * A pattern such as (?abc)(?(R)xyz) was incorrectly compiled such that the conditional was interpreted as a reference to capturing group 1 instead of a test for recursion. Any group whose name began with R was misinterpreted in this way. (The reference interpretation should only happen if the group's name is precisely "R".) * A number of bugs have been mended relating to match start-up optimizations when the first thing in a pattern is a positive lookahead. These all applied only when PCRE_NO_START_OPTIMIZE was *not* set: + A pattern such as (?=.*X)X$ was incorrectly optimized as if it needed both an initial 'X' and a following 'X'. + Some patterns starting with an assertion that started with .* were incorrectly optimized as having to match at the start of the subject or after a newline. There are cases where this is not true, for example, (?=.*[A-Z])(?=.{8,16})(?!.*[\s]) matches after the start in lines that start with spaces. Starting .* in an assertion is no longer taken as an indication of matching at the start (or after a newline).- Explicitly package %{_docdir}/%{name} to fix build with RPM 4.13.- record minor vulnerabilities fixed in 8.39- Update to version 8.39: * Some appropriate PCRE2 JIT improvements have been retro-fitted to PCRE1. * CVE-2016-3191: workspace overflow for (*ACCEPT) with deeply nested parentheses (boo#971741) * CVE-2016-1283: Heap buffer overflow DoS (boo#960837) * Apart from that, this is another bug-fix release.- pcre 8.38: * CVE-2015-3217: Call Stack Overflow Vulnerability in match() bsc#933878 * Other fixes to assertions, crashes, buffer overflows and performance issues found by fuzzer, affecting applications accepting regular expression from untrusted sources- pcre 8.37: * CVE-2015-2325: Patterns with certain groups specifying a zero minimum quantifier caused incorrect code to be compiled, leading to an incorrect memory read. [boo#924960] * CVE-2015-2326: Specific patterns containing a forward reference with subroutine calls caused incorrect code to be compiled [boo#924961] * CVE-2014-8964: If an assertion condition was quantified with a minimum of zero, SIGSEGV or other misbehaviour could occur. [boo#906574] * further bug fixes as listed in ChangeLog- Update to version 3.16 * This is primarily a bug-fix release. * The Unicode data tables have been updated to Unicode 7.0.0. - Remove pcre-commit1472.patch; fixed on upstream release - Remove obsolete "Obsoletes" tag/sbin/ldconfig/sbin/ldconfigibs-arm-3 16245225168.41-6.4.28.41-6.4.2libpcreposix.so.0libpcreposix.so.0.0.5/usr/lib64/-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -gobs://build.suse.de/SUSE:Maintenance:19625/SUSE_SLE-15_Update/c29fd075853c9c65f9f8c8afbfdf250e-pcre.SUSE_SLE-15_Updatecpioxz5aarch64-suse-linuxELF 64-bit LSB shared object, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=91a5cc782bdb2896de7854ffff81ad7e03fd9ce3, strippedPRRRRRPxYkʔutf-86809e2a93d6b0251ba9a180d0e73c6c9724558faa63f983998533694db38c666?7zXZ !t/ ] cr$x#DU + c.2ִ8|}+>Ygoa }&. _>S  j BC#>lSN[3<2!*ds72 ڨ<pD6dvfΖN[ 'H;3&p(+J5[7B4mך‰""cB=[>ROCT߰'2=eNƁÄ vY.(]ߺ-qg @ѪDrkv\oM@-!L1Q7 :jaHBiVT$kԛZJ720PǝwID¯4ޯ.7P uXh#7nb4Mе)<0x[ha*,λH< 2k1z)lQsmϢH4,ɚDgf|b# UTTQz4u!7.,R(jkSŧ4 cQVi}YȾ>Ї ֯;rH~X[sz1@_ mᇻЏPpإl(Ubֈ[|Dد80Û NZn {![5`; F7 ?H\g/39@6 n#i"z1[97z>5af*Eh:U(@+~U:}Y tY4ĝ&^O+[q{kUMb$0,GuljG%u(LO.ubI0=U[ِ%# v. 9e{a_SeL?$: bffMlyWW`E?[a%]p!@d'Ws+ÑFRK~T5Z.`W\Jh<9JI˻#fkFjUdBB8ErաC!m4s [t_oe!{aidkm%1f?A./X7Jީ޵|c$ Ww0K9 rĪB8¬nv=Տ_ob.J"s1" ޹ȉtU*e:^˰CwpbgK1ɴ쇉(oIgG1eǪ.P:G 7utyWCz1R vQ)QZI{ݪJX85^,@_jjUyN&)!}H Gǔ$Ҝ]FA OOܧJ N"5 gרXM݊['j?|s{<3UП.*ޅWH玫\mΰ4\:F0æ5NU$w-QE]x$#=}6 sܤ- +̃KƤ^ xl_?)a_%b'#^*!L9U@x\\T}zQDr#t"]5kؓ߄7G7UB3r]bfCJ59d21Y]POὊ[VU)M eRYSX3L9̷Ґ.ބ5J,ew]Up޲ly$𯔱,t(hP͚ gA}m2CYS$Œ"TZq$!$m;o xFC}1 sVF р80ig@1p=g=\lt۝\" 5,\ twjHT"W1Ig4,M89ӮFB4 FgLXUglĦ <2vKS8J&7`Q݈,ba6HIدp19bh]MjR3VKޯGj8bul8<F?֙j:5yA %ɾ?OH45pRP3uSl512.оɖtz0ij gv0<ET$2IݦXRK;=-ʰ.@TFrRtH੮-kgms=\CeLC>Dq>SerIMMXi/fщP+& _gʰ}gg@բ/BI`)܆=`VF1H,3" @g m/N>R]P<e'ώ{r"]GD/}< Ӛ).e`=^ǙfvTyE6qk!\G5n鼒 0#7?V՘Fa^>7QCTӼ* poގܚ2%0 8~ZjR1{0R0sƣ<()Z,@rN^D5:a